Having a grievance against someone or the other can be a very frustrating thing for anyone to have to go through, and there are several situations where they might want to resort to litigation because they feel like their concerns won’t be addressed through any other means. Suffice it to say that corporations usually look to solve these matters outside of court by blocking litigation once all has been said and is now out of the way. The reason behind this is that the more litigation that occurs, the more likely it will be that the company’s reputation would become less stellar than might have been the case otherwise.
Hence, many companies are willing to hire an alternate dispute resolution attorney that will help bring matters to a close without letting things escalate to the point where litigation would become anyone’s recourse of choice. This raises the question of who pays for the dispute resolution process. While companies often pay for the lawyer themselves, a lot of the time both parties that hired the lawyer will be liable to pay for them as long as the company was not at fault for whatever transpired between them.
There are a lot of benefits to alternative dispute resolution that make it preferable to litigation. For one thing, it allows you to resolve your conflict in a much faster way than if you had litigated and taken matters to open court. The court system is notorious for being extremely slow, and you can get over the issue in an instant if you opt for ADR. Just make sure that you hire a lawyer that knows how ADR works so they do it right.